Primaries show the danger of focusing on bad data

Whatever your politics, this year's presidential primaries are a great lesson in how to focus on the wrong metrics. Because I'm hearing way too much chatter about how many states a candidate has won -- a data point that's all but meaningless.

Folks, Texas has 27 million people. Vermont has less than a million. "States" are not some sort of measurement unit that have the same value -- especially with complicated delegate-selection rules that can let a "loser" earn as many delegates as a winner. Counting up "state wins" for a candidate would be like Amazon focusing on total number of customers instead of how much those customers buy and which sales are most profitable.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here