Independent Electoral Panel delivers wishlist for the left
It is perhaps no surprise that a panel hand picked by Labour and Greens has delivered a report recommending massive electoral changes that would benefit them. I wanted to give the panel some benefit of the doubt, and did a submission myself, asking to be heard. I never was a asked to appear, which is […]
The post Independent Electoral Panel delivers wishlist for the left first appeared on Kiwiblog.
It is perhaps no surprise that a panel hand picked by Labour and Greens has delivered a report recommending massive electoral changes that would benefit them.
I wanted to give the panel some benefit of the doubt, and did a submission myself, asking to be heard. I never was a asked to appear, which is surprising for someone who has written extensively on electoral issues for over 20 years.
Here are their key recommendations:
- Entrench Treaty principles in the Electoral Act
- Lower threshold to 3.5%
- Abolish electorate seat threshold
- Fix ratio of electorate: list seats to be 60:40 so Parliament size increases as number of electorates grows
- Referendum on a four year term
- No fixed election date
- Abolish Waka-jumping law
- Lower voting age to 16
- Allow all prisoners the vote
- Allow Maori to change rolls up to any including on election day
- Ban donations of over $30,000 and increase taxpayer funding of parties to around $6 million per electoral cycle
- Ban donations from companies and unions
Pretty much every cause championed by the left has been recommended. In theory I should welcome this report because it would be amazing for the Taxpayers’ Union. If donations over $30,000 are banned, then we would become like the United States (where donations are capped at $2,300) with PACs becoming mega-powerful and bundlers turning up everywhere. It amazes me that people who claim to be worried about the influence of money in politics always recommend a US style donation system.
The proposed changes to the threshold are interesting to look at, based on what would have happened in the past if they had been in place then.
- 1996: Christian Coalition would have gained five seats giving potential balance of power to Rev Graham Cahill, now known to be a pedophile as National and NZ First would no longer have a majority
- 1999: no change
- 2002: Anderton’s Party doesn’t get a 2nd MP. Doesn’t impact overall outcome
- 2005: United loses two List MPs and ACT one List MP.
- 2008: NZ First remain in Parliament with five MPs. National and Act would no longer have a majority
- 2011: no change
- 2014: Colin Craig would hold balance of power with five MPs, Māori Party lose a List MP
- 2017: no change
- 2020: Māori Party lose a List MP
So what the panel recommends would have seen Rev Capill and Colin Craig both holding the balance of power.
No tag for this post.The post Independent Electoral Panel delivers wishlist for the left first appeared on Kiwiblog.