Bluebird, what do you feed on? By which I mean: How do I get verified as a freelance journalist, Twitter?
That blue bird over at Twitter certainly is inscrutable when it comes to verifying accounts — the granting of the blue checkmark that deems someone some combination of important, extant, and ready to be lumped together with all the other horrifying elite “bluechecks.” Twitter has done a lot to try to make the process more...
Bluebird, we come to you for facts, for valuable
Information, for secret reports.
Bluebird, tell us, what do you feed on?—Carl Sandburg, “Bluebird, What Do You Feed On?”
I just came to tell you
To tell Lesley (will you?)
That her little Bluebird
Wanted me to bring word
That the north wind last night
That made the stars bright
And made ice on the trough
Almost made him cough
His tail feathers off.
He just had to fly!—Robert Frost, “The Last Word of a Bluebird?”
there’s a bluebird in my heart that
wants to get out
but I’m too tough for him,
I say, stay in there, I’m not going
to let anybody see
you.—Charles Bukowski, “Bluebird”
@verified this was my fourth time applying!! wtf is up—freelance journalists
That blue bird over at Twitter certainly is inscrutable when it comes to verifying accounts — the granting of the blue checkmark that deems someone some combination of important, extant, and ready to be lumped together with all the other horrifying elite “bluechecks.”
Twitter has done a lot to try to make the process more scalable and less opaque…but transparent it still ain’t. Maybe “translucent” is a good interim goal? Here’s Charlotte Tobitt for the Press Gazette:
Freelance journalists are “frustrated” at the Twitter verification process which has left even well-established writers with large followings feeling like “second-class citizens”.
Twitter began rolling out its new verification system last summer, with journalists among those encouraged to apply for blue ticks on their profiles to allow the public to see that they are trustworthy sources of information.
But not everyone feels the rollout has been successful or fair and almost 80 freelance journalists have now added their names to a list of those who feel their applications have wrongly been rejected. Some staff journalists who have struggled to get a blue tick also feel Twitter’s policies have been applied inconsistently.
Here’s that list, now at 78 names; here’s one of its organizers, established freelance health journalist Emma Wilkinson:
For those who don't know, freelance journalists have their own category in the application process. Step 1 is you have to provide 3-10 articles written in past 6 months. No problem, I have more than 100 bylines from this period.
— Emmajourno (@Emmajourno) January 12, 2022
Twitter has already verified these publications and staff journalists and editors working for them also have blue ticks. If you have 'notability' criteria that's different for freelancers then it would be helpful to share it with us. Also if you do then why??
— Emmajourno (@Emmajourno) January 12, 2022
This fourth rejection was the fastest – decision in under an hour to explain my work isn't notable enough which doesn't exactly fill me with confidence that this has been looked at properly?
— Emmajourno (@Emmajourno) January 12, 2022
This fourth rejection was the fastest – decision in under an hour to explain my work isn't notable enough which doesn't exactly fill me with confidence that this has been looked at properly?
— Emmajourno (@Emmajourno) January 12, 2022